Re: [p2pi] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [p2pi] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2008-10-21, at 10:12, ext Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ] wrote:
>> The charter, as written looks reasonable to me.  I just hate the name
>> :).
> 
> the name was an ad hoc creation, and when it was picked, some of the
> stuff that ended up being ALTO was part of the TANA scope - so it needed
> to be broader.
> 
> If we can come up with a better name I'm all ears (and you make several
> good suggestions below). What I'd like to avoid is a long discussion
> about a text string, when what I'd rather like to see is a discussion on
> whether the work we're going to attempt is reasonable.
> 
> Lars
> 
>> It should really be something like:
>> "Minimizing Impact of Large Transfers" (MILT)
>> "Concurrent Realtime And Bulk Applications" (CRABA)
>> "Fast Transfers Adding Minimal Latency" (FTAML)
>> "Bulk And Realtime Flows Interacting as Good Neighbors" (BARFIGN) --
>> probably not a good one as it looks too much like "barfing" :)

FWIW, it seems like "background TCP" is what you want (BTCP); granted,
that's already a spec'd protocol ;-)

Maybe, more generally, Background Congestion Control (BACK-CC)?

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkj99+EACgkQE5f5cImnZrvY9ACgxGAeY/J4lMtZvxEht+/gxdfx
KDUAniB8eeoRz0Z4HDyDBCGbKAHtAVvn
=KTqj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.