Re: [p2pi] TANA proposed charter -- packet marking question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [p2pi] TANA proposed charter -- packet marking question




On Oct 24, 2008, at 9:12 AM, John Leslie wrote:


I start a full rate, SINGLE TCP flow to this remote system.  The ping
time jumps up to 3 seconds! Yes, the stupid NAT box or DSL modem (not
sure which at this moment) has a 3 second packet buffer, and simple
FIFO behavior.  Any full rate upload and I can kiss my connection
goodbye.  Period.  End of story.  Have a nice day.

  Fortunately, the Linksys _could_ be easily programmed to fix that --
and if the problem becomes obvious enough to enough buyers, the
competition will fix it...

I disagree.

I've had DSL or cable modem connectivity for damn-near a decade now. And fixing it is easy: the data rates are trivial, the devices are often programmable, and the solution straightforward: just have only 30ms of packet buffer, not 3s. Yet these devices STILL have this problem.

And the only reason that as a clued user it would be fixable if its the Linksys box is I DELIBERATELY purchased the version where I can replace the firmware to fix something the vendors refused to fix for themselves. And I just unplugged the linksys: its the DSL modem, purchased within the past 2.5 years.

(The reason its not a problem for me is I don't use P2P apps, and only rarely upload large quantities of photos)

So I think the conclusion should be there has been a market failure in this area, and that absent a miracle, this problem will remain.

_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.