[p2pi] p2pi@ vs. tana@ / alto@ (decomm p2pi at ?)

To: <p2pi at ietf.org>, <tana at ietf.org>, <alto-reqs at ubiq.TILAB.COM>
Subject: [p2pi] p2pi@ vs. tana@ / alto@ (decomm p2pi at ?)
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:25:49 -0400
Delivered-to: ietfarch-p2pi-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: p2pi at core3.amsl.com
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: p2pi-bounces at ietf.org
Thread-index: Ack1/Y4yiSLvN0WBRzeqo8DIyQ/nXA==
Thread-topic: p2pi@ vs. tana@ / alto@ (decomm p2pi at ?)

Seems like there is a lot of cross-posting, and that at least tana@ and
alto@ lists are more targeted now.  Is it time to deactivate the p2pi@
mailing list?

Jason
_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [p2pi] [tana] p2pi@ vs. tana@ / alto@ (decomm p2pi at ?)
  - From: Stanislav Shalunov

Prev by Date: Re: [p2pi] TANA proposed charter -- packet marking question
Next by Date: Re: [p2pi] TANA proposed charter
Previous by thread: [p2pi] alto wg meeting in Minneapolis ?
Next by thread: Re: [p2pi] [tana] p2pi@ vs. tana@ / alto@ (decomm p2pi at ?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[p2pi] p2pi@ vs. tana@ / alto@ (decomm p2pi at ?)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.