 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I’m new to this list and I have some questions concerning PANA and NAT traversal. I've been browsing the mail archive and the current drafts but I still feel uncertain about what the status is.
What I wonder is pretty straight-forward. Is PANA applicable in the following two NAT scenarios:
1. NAT between PAA and EP
+----------+ +--------+ +----+ +-----+ +-----+
| MN (PaC) |------| Router |---------| EP |---| NAT |---| PAA |
+----------+ +--------+ +----+ +-----+ +-----+
(One or
several) .
<=== Bootstrapped IPSec tunnel ===>
My understanding is that PANA should work in such a scenario (I've seen some slide set from IETF62). Correct? Any issues?
2. NAT between PaC and EP
+----------+ +-----+ +--------+ +----+ +-----+
| MN (PaC) |------| NAT |-----| Router |---------| EP |---| PAA |
+----------+ +-----+ +--------+ +----+ +-----+
(One or
several) .
<======== Bootstrapped IPSec tunnel ========>
Whether this is also supported I feel unsure about. My understanding of PANA details is not deep enough. Will PANA work here?
If someone could provide answers to my questions I'd really appreciate it.
Best regards,
Bob Melander
_______________________________________________ Pana mailing list Pana at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana