Re: [Pana] Re: outstanding issues
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Pana] Re: outstanding issues



Just for your information, I have submitted revision -14 that includes
easier part of your comments before the submission deadline.  I hope
this helps us to focus on discussing the last items.

Yoshihiro Ohba


On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:06:43AM +0100, Mark Townsley wrote:
> 
> Alper and PANA WG,
> 
> I apologize for being unresponsive to our thread over the past week and 
> a half, I was traveling with my family though had hoped to retain enough 
> contact with this issue to continue to respond in relative real-time. 
> Unfortunately, we all came down with the flu on our trip, which made 
> things far more difficult than I had expected.
> 
> We are well and back home now. Aside of the basic administration run-up 
> to the IETF (which of course includes time-consuming tasks like BoF 
> agendas and plenaries) I will be focusing with you on converging these 
> last items so that we can finally get the new (and hopefully improved) 
> version of the PANA specification in front of the IETF and IESG soon.
> 
> - Mark
> 
> Alper Yegin wrote:
> >Mark,
> >
> >I believe we iterated one more round in response to your e-mails on PANA
> >issues. Could you process the e-mails and let us know what you think? 
> >
> >Once we converge on all, I'll send a summary message on the list and we'll
> >revise the document accordingly.
> >
> >Alper
> >
> >  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pana mailing list
> Pana at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
> 

_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
Pana at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.