[Pana] RE: Sam's IESG comments
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Pana] RE: Sam's IESG comments



Sam,

Thank you. 

Let's see if we can close the opens until than. If not, we'd like to get on
your agenda. I'll send you a separate note on that.

I think we have reduced the list down to two:

- Version number management. 

Need more thinking/discussion.

- Necessity of data integrity. 

I had sent a response. I wonder if it made sense, or you'd still prefer to
change the language in the document. 


Alper

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Hartman [mailto:hartmans-ietf at mit.edu]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 4:31 PM
> To: Alper Yegin
> Cc: 'Jari Arkko'; 'Mark Townsley'; pana at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Sam's IESG comments
> 
> If we are not able to resolve this before Chicago, perhaps we could
> meet there and try to come to resolution on these issues.
> 
> My schedule is still relatively free.


_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
Pana at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.