Re: [Pana] RE: Proposed changes for algorithm negotiation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pana] RE: Proposed changes for algorithm negotiation
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 02:47:38AM +0300, Alper Yegin wrote:
> Yoshi,
>
> > 5.4. Message Authentication
> >
> > A PANA message can contain an AUTH AVP for cryptographically
> > protecting the message.
> >
> > When an AUTH AVP is included in the last PANA-Auth-Request and
> > PANA-Auth-Answer messages with 'C' (Complete) bit set in the
> > authentication and authorization phase, the value field of
> > the AUTH AVP is calculated by using the PANA_AUTH_KEY in the
> > following way:
> >
> > AUTH AVP value = PANA_AUTH_HASH(PANA_AUTH_KEY, PANA_PDU,
> > I_PAR, I_PAN)
> >
> > When an AUTH AVP is included in any other PANA message, the value
> > field of the AUTH AVP is calculated in the following way:
> >
> > AUTH AVP value = PANA_AUTH_HASH(PANA_AUTH_KEY, PANA_PDU)
>
>
> Not sure which one is better: Having single formula in the spec (good for a
> simpler spec), or not having to repeat the same AVPs at a later message
> (good for reducing payload). I'm slightly leaning towards the former.....
If that is the case, how about having I_PAR/I_PAN in the PANA_AUTH_KEY
derivation algorithm, and keeping the currently defined AUTH AVP
calculation algorithm in pana-pana-17 as it is? I mean:
PANA_AUTH_KEY = prf+(MSK, I_PAR|I_PAN|PaC_nonce|PAA_nonce|Key_ID)
(SessionID is included in I_PAR and I_PAN.)
Yoshihiro Ohba
>
>
> > In the above AUTH AVP calculation algorithms, PANA_PDU represents
> > the PANA message including the PANA header, with the AUTH AVP value
> > field first initialized to 0. I_PAR is the initial
> > PANA-Auth-Request message with 'S' (Start) bit set. I_PAN is the
> > initial PANA-Auth-Answer message with 'S' (Start) bit set.
>
> So that people don't mistakenly take the whole IP packet as the PANA
> message, let's say "I_PAR is the initial PANA-Auth-Request message (the PANA
> header and the following PANA AVPs) with 'S' (Start) bit set."
>
> Alper
>
>
>
> > PANA_AUTH_HASH represents the integrity algorithm negotiated during
> > the initial PANA-Auth-Request and PANA-Auth-Answer message
> > exchange.
> > "
> >
> > [8] Change PAR format in Section 7.2 as follows:
> >
> > PANA-Auth-Request ::= < PANA-Header: 2, REQ[,STA][,COM] >
> > [ EAP-Payload ]
> > [ Nonce ]
> > * [ PRF-Algorithm ]
> > * [ Integrity-Algorithm ]
> > [ Result-Code ]
> > [ Session-Lifetime ]
> > [ Key-Id ]
> > * [ AVP ]
> > 0*1 < AUTH >
> >
> > [9] Change PAR format in Section 7.3 as follows:
> >
> > PANA-Auth-Answer ::= < PANA-Header: 2 [,STA][,COM] >
> > [ Nonce ]
> > [ EAP-Payload ]
> > [ PRF-Algorithm ]
> > [ Integrity-Algorithm ]
> > [ Key-Id ]
> > * [ AVP ]
> > 0*1 < AUTH >
> >
> > [10] Change AVP occurrence table as follows:
> >
> > The table uses the following symbols:
> >
> > 0 The AVP MUST NOT be present in the message.
> >
> > 0-1 Zero or one instance of the AVP MAY be present in the message.
> > It is considered an error if there are more than one instance
> > of the AVP.
> >
> > 1 One instance of the AVP MUST be present in the message.
> >
> > 0+ Zero or more instance of the AVP MAY be present in the message.
> >
> >
> >
> > +---------------------------+
> > | Message Type |
> > +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
> > Attribute Name |PCI|PAR|PAN|PTR|PTA|PNR|PNA|
> > ----------------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
> > PRF-Algorithm | 0 |0+ |0-1| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > Integrity-Algorithm | 0 |0+ |0-1| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > AUTH | 0 |0-1|0-1|0-1|0-1|0-1|0-1|
> > EAP-Payload | 0 |0-1|0-1| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > Key-Id | 0 |0-1|0-1| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > Nonce | 0 |0-1|0-1| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > Result-Code | 0 |0-1| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > Session-Lifetime | 0 |0-1| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > Termination-Cause | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> > ----------------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
> >
> > Figure 4: AVP Occurrence Table
> >
> > [11] Remove Section 8.1 (Algorithm AVP) and add the following sections
> > instead:
> >
> > "
> > 8.X. Integrity-Algorithm AVP
> >
> > The PRF-Algorithm AVP (AVP Code X) is used for conveying the the
> > integrity algorithm to compute an AUTH AVP. The AVP data is of
> > type Unsigned32.
> >
> > The AVP data contains an IKEv2 Transform ID of Transform Type 3
> > [RFC4306] for the integrity algorithm.
> >
> > All PANA implementations MUST support AUTH_HMAC_SHA1_160 (7)
> > [RFC4595].
> > "
> >
> > "
> > 8.Y. PRF-Algorithm AVP
> >
> > The PRF-Algorithm AVP (AVP Code Y) is used for conveying the
> > pseudo-random function to derive PANA_AUTH_KEY. The AVP data is of
> > type Unsigned32.
> >
> > The AVP data contains an IKEv2 Transform ID of Transform Type 2
> > [RFC4306].
> >
> > All PANA implementations MUST support PRF_HMAC_SHA1 (2) [RFC2104].
> > "
> >
> > (Note: Unsigned32 is used here instead of Unsigned16 because RFC3588
> > does not define Unsigned16 datatype.)
> >
> > [12] Change Section 8.2:
> >
> > "
> > 8.2. AUTH AVP
> >
> > The AUTH AVP (AVP Code 2) is used to integrity protect PANA messages.
> > The AVP data payload contains the Message Authentication Code encoded
> > in network byte order. The AVP length varies depending on the
> > integrity algorithm specified in an Algorithm AVP. The AVP data is
> > of type OctetString.
> > "
> >
> > to:
> >
> > "
> > 8.2. AUTH AVP
> >
> > The AUTH AVP (AVP Code 2) is used to integrity protect PANA
> > messages. The AVP data payload contains the Message Authentication
> > Code encoded in network byte order. The AVP length varies
> > depending on the integrity algorithm negotiated in the initial
> > PANA-Auth-Request and PANA-Auth-Answer exchange with 'S' bit set
> > using Integrity-Algorithm AVP. The AVP data is of type
> > OctetString.
> > "
> >
> > [13] Change the following paragraph of Section 10.3.1:
> >
> > "
> > AVP Code 0 is not used. This document defines the AVP Codes 1-8.
> > See Section 8.1 through Section 8.8 for the assignment of the
> > namespace in this specification.
> > "
> >
> > to:
> >
> > "
> > AVP Code 0 is not used. This document defines the AVP Codes 1-9.
> > See Section 8.1 through Section 8.9 for the assignment of the
> > namespace in this specification.
> > "
> >
> > [14] Remove the following paragraph from Section 11.2:
> >
> > "
> > In networks where lower-layers are not secured prior to running PANA,
> > the capability discovery enabled through inclusion of an Algorithm
> > AVP in the initial PANA-Auth-Request message is susceptible to
> > spoofing leading to DoS attacks. Therefore, usage of this AVP during
> > the initial message exchange in such insecure networks is NOT
> > RECOMMENDED. The same AVP is delivered with integrity protection via
> > the last PANA-Auth-Request message upon successful authentication.
> > "
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pana mailing list
> Pana at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
>
_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
Pana at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.