Re: [Pana] What to do with I-D: draft-ietf-pana-ipsec

[<Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com>]

Hi Yoshi,

Current intent is to complete the WG I-Ds. Given that the PEMK I-D is not a WG document at this time, I would be reluctant to consider any further action from the PANA WG perspective. 

-Raj 

-----Original Message-----
From: pana-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:pana-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Yoshihiro Ohba
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 6:50 PM
To: Jari Arkko
Cc: pana at ietf.org; Patil Basavaraj (Nokia-D/Dallas)
Subject: Re: [Pana] What to do with I-D: draft-ietf-pana-ipsec

There is a related document (i.e., draft-ohba-pana-pemk-02) that defines PaC-EP Master Key (PEMK).  PEMK is derived to be cryptographically independent across multiple different types of lower layers including IPsec.  What should we do with pana-pemk draft?

Yoshihiro Ohba


On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:12:10PM +0300, Jari Arkko wrote:
> My primary issue with this document was the lack of cycles, if there 
> had been no one interested in taking it to completion we should have 
> dropped it. Since you two are volunteering, can you work with the 
> chairs to take over the work, and do whatever is needed to bring the 
> document to a reasonable state?
>
> Jari
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pana mailing list
> Pana at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
>
_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
Pana at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana