Re: [PCN] PCN WG last call for draft-ietf-pcn-architecture-05.txt

[<philip.eardley at bt.com>]

Thanks for your supportive remarks, and spotting these 2 errors
phil
{ 	- section 6.3: figure 2 does not line up with 2 state marking.
{ 			excess marking and threshold marking is
{ mentioned,
{ 			I would assume only threshold marking is used
{ (even for admittance).
{ 			rest of the figure looks OK.

Thanks. in fact only excess marking is used. 
Above PCN-excess-rate, it should read "Some pkts excess-traffic-marked"
Above U*PCN-excess-rate, it should read "Further pkts
excess-traffic-marked" 

(sorry, I don't know what happened here. I remember copying Figure 1 and
making the appropriate changes, but somehow I must have managed to undo
the changes!!)


_______________________________________________
PCN mailing list
PCN at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn