Re: [PCN] PCN References

Joe

I got this guidance from scott

{ teh RFC Editor holds documents that have normative references to IDs

{ until the IDs are published but informative references to

{ IDs are ok and will not hold up publication if they are referred to

{ as "work in progress" rather than by teh ID name

-----Original Message-----
From: Jozef Babiarz [mailto:babiarz at nortel.com]
Sent: 09 September 2008 04:13
To: Eardley,PL,Philip,CXR9 R; pcn at ietf.org
Subject: RE: [PCN] PCN References

RFC can not have reference to I-Ds. References to the two I-Ds will hold publishing of this document as an RFC until the I-Ds are published as RFCs.

I would suggest the way forward is to remove reference to I-Ds. I do not believe that they are accentual to PCN Architecture doc.

Regards, Joe
email:babiarz at nortel.com
Telephone:613-763-6098

From: pcn-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:pcn-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of philip.eardley at bt.com
Sent: September 8, 2008 12:22 PM
To: pcn at ietf.org
Subject: [PCN] PCN References

I’ve been looking at references in the Architecture document.

I’d put everything as an Informative reference, due to mistaking that Informational doc => Informative refs.

http://www.rfc-editor.org/policy.html gives the following guidance:

“Normative references specify documents that must be read to understand or implement the technology in the new RFC, or whose technology must be present for the technology in the new RFC to work. An informative reference is not normative; rather, it only provides additional information. For example, an informative reference might provide background or historical information. Informative references are not required to implement the technology in the RFC.”

I believe that we have just 2 Normative references for the Architecture doc (surprisingly the first is currently not a reference!!):

RFC2474 Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers

RFC3246 An Expedited Forwarding PHB (Per-Hop Behavior)

All the others are Informative refs. I’m a bit worried about 2 I-Ds, eardley-pcn-marking-behaviour & moncaster-pcn-baseline-encoding and am thinking more about those.

Please shout if you disagree - Thanks,

phil