[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PCN] Second Last Call for draft-ietf-pcn-architecture

To: pcn at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PCN] Second Last Call for draft-ietf-pcn-architecture
From: Steven Blake <slblake at petri-meat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:35:48 -0400
Delivered-to: ietfarch-pcn-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: pcn at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <864b1db62edbb6688022b71b9421de85 at petri-meat.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pcn>
List-help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <864b1db62edbb6688022b71b9421de85 at petri-meat.com>
Sender: pcn-bounces at ietf.org

By my reading of the last call comments, the only remaining issue where
we have some disagreement is surrounding the terminology proposed by
Michael Menth.

Does everyone agree that this is the last remaining issue?

If so, could we close on that this week?  Please send your commments to
the list ASAP.


Regards,

// Steve

_______________________________________________
PCN mailing list
PCN at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PCN] Second Last Call for draft-ietf-pcn-architecture
  - From: Georgios Karagiannis

References:
- [PCN] Second Last Call for draft-ietf-pcn-architecture
  - From: slblake

Prev by Date: Re: [PCN] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pcn-baseline-encoding-00.txt
Next by Date: Re: [PCN] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pcn-marking-behaviour-00.txt
Previous by thread: Re: [PCN] Second Last Call for draft-ietf-pcn-architecture
Next by thread: Re: [PCN] Second Last Call for draft-ietf-pcn-architecture
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread