[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PCN] Second Last Call for draft-ietf-pcn-architecture
Hi Phil
I have read version 07 of the PCN architecture draft.
Thanks for trying to incorporate my last comments.
However, I think that some more clarifications are needed:
Comment_1:
Section 6, page 15:
Please remove the words "at most" that refers to the extension of
encodings:
Please change from:
"Extension encodings may be
defined that, at most, use a second DSCP .."
INTO:
"Extension encodings may be
defined that use a second DSCP .."
-----------------------------
Comment_2:
Section 7.4, page 23:
Please add the following combination of words to the following sentence:
- (others might be possible)
Please change from:
"As well as the functions covered above, other specific admission
control functions need to be performed:"
INTO:
"As well as the functions covered above, other specific admission
control functions need to be performed (others might be possible):"
------------------------------------
Comment_3:
Section 7.4, page 23:
Please change from:
"There are various possibilities for how the functionality could be
distributed (we assume the operator would configure which is used):"
INTO:
"There are various possibilities (others might be possible) for how the
functionality could be
distributed (we assume the operator would configure whiFrom pcn-bounces at ietf.org Wed Oct 15 00:18:10 2008
Return-Path: <pcn-bounces at ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pcn-archive at optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pcn-archive at core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817273A6886;
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pcn at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn at core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5357C3A685D
for <pcn at core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.465,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Xar+tg1MO0HS for <pcn at core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rotterdam.ewi.utwente.nl (rotterdam.ewi.utwente.nl
[130.89.10.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6A83A6858
for <pcn at ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.cs.utwente.nl (janus.ewi.utwente.nl [130.89.10.26])
by rotterdam.ewi.utwente.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id m9F7GkRE029347
for <pcn at ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:16:46 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from 84.82.109.231 (auth. user karagian at imap1.ewi.utwente.nl)
by webmail.cs.utwente.nl with HTTP; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:16:46 +0000
To: "pcn at ietf.org" <pcn at ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:16:46 +0000
X-Mailer: IlohaMail/0.8.13 (On: webmail.cs.utwente.nl)
Message-ID: <Mvuz1dqX.1224055006.4119990.karagian at ewi.utwente.nl>
In-Reply-To: <1223987748.10191.13.camel at tachyon>
From: "Georgios Karagiannis" <karagian at cs.utwente.nl>
Bounce-To: "Georgios Karagiannis" <karagian at cs.utwente.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 130.89.10.5
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0rc3
(rotterdam.ewi.utwente.nl [130.89.10.5]);
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:16:47 +0200 (MEST)
Subject: Re: [PCN] Second Last Call for draft-ietf-pcn-architecture
X-BeenThere: pcn at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>,
<mailto:pcn-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>,
<mailto:pcn-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: pcn-bounces at ietf.org
Errors-To: pcn-bounces at ietf.org
Hi Phil
I have read version 07 of the PCN architecture draft.
Thanks for trying to incorporate my last comments.
However, I think that some more clarifications are needed:
Comment_1:
Section 6, page 15:
Please remove the words "at most" that refers to the extension of
encodings:
Please change from:
"Extension encodings may be
defined that, at most, use a second DSCP .."
INTO:
"Extension encodings may be
defined that use a second DSCP .."
-----------------------------
Comment_2:
Section 7.4, page 23:
Please add the following combination of words to the following sentence:
- (others might be possible)
Please change from:
"As well as the functions covered above, other specific admission
control functions need to be performed:"
INTO:
"As well as the functions covered above, other specific admission
control functions need to be performed (others might be possible):"
------------------------------------
Comment_3:
Section 7.4, page 23:
Please change from:
"There are various possibilities for how the functionality could be
distributed (we assume the operator would configure which is used):"
INTO:
"There are various possibilities (others might be possible) for how the
functionality could be
distributed (we assume the operator would configure which is usch is used):"
-------------------------
Comment_4:
Section 7.5, page 24:
Please change from:
"As well as the functions covered above, other specific termination
control functions need to be performed:"
INTO:
"As well as the functions covered above, other specific termination
control functions need to be performed (others might be possible):"
Best regards,
Georgios
On 10/14/2008, "Steven Blake" <slblake at petri-meat.com> wrote:
>By my reading of the last call comments, the only remaining issue where
>we have some disagreement is surrounding the terminology proposed by
>Michael Menth.
>
>Does everyone agree that this is the last remaining issue?
>
>If so, could we close on that this week? Please send your commments to
>the list ASAP.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>// Steve
>
>_______________________________________________
>PCN mailing list
>PCN at ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn
_______________________________________________
PCN mailing list
PCN at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn
ed):"
-------------------------
Comment_4:
Section 7.5, page 24:
Please change from:
"As well as the functions covered above, other specific termination
control functions need to be performed:"
INTO:
"As well as the functions covered above, other specific termination
control functions need to be performed (others might be possible):"
Best regards,
Georgios
On 10/14/2008, "Steven Blake" <slblake at petri-meat.com> wrote:
>By my reading of the last call comments, the only remaining issue where
>we have some disagreement is surrounding the terminology proposed by
>Michael Menth.
>
>Does everyone agree that this is the last remaining issue?
>
>If so, could we close on that this week? Please send your commments to
>the list ASAP.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>// Steve
>
>_______________________________________________
>PCN mailing list
>PCN at ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn
_______________________________________________
PCN mailing list
PCN at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn