Re: [PCN] Second Last Call for draft-ietf-pcn-architecture

[<philip.eardley at bt.com>]

{ > Why would affected marking need a 3rd dscp? 2 dscps would
{ > seem to leave plenty of room.
{ 
{ Georgios: It depends on how the specification of the encoding states
{ will be standardised.

Well, that's not really an answer.

{ >
{ > Ok. I don't see why comment 3 (distribution of admission ctrl
{ > functionality) applies.
{ 
{ Georgios: You are right. If comment_2 is worked out, than comment_3
will
{ also be worked out!
{ 
just to make sure I understand. If I add in comments 2 & 4, then you're
happy that I ignore comment 3.

_______________________________________________
PCN mailing list
PCN at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn