Hi, this sounds like a reasonable way forward. Lars On 2009-8-19, at 11:30, toby.moncaster at bt.com wrote:
My proposed solution (based on the comments over the past 3 days) aimsto do two things, firstly to clarify that PCN is an alternative marking behaviour that Operators can specify for certain DSCPs (without changing the scheduling or other behaviours), secondly it should recommend 1 (or more) DSCPs that are currently suitable and should list what we believeare the criteria for suitability AND/OR explain what we would expect needed to happen if people wanted to suggest other DSCPs that it could apply to (either existing or new ones). This second bit is more thornyand I am not sure I am best placed to do it. I would welcome any offersof text for that bit... The end result will be that we have a doc that really makes no IANA requests, that suggests a suitable DSCP to apply PCN to initially and that explains what makes that DSCP suitable...
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature