[pcp] [I-D.ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking] Issue #3: Lifetime Management/failure
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Tue, 29 November 2011 13:53 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0651521F8B17 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 05:53:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.114, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_FONT_SIZE_LARGE=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a8RX9ji2qF7I for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 05:53:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497B721F8B15 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 05:53:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.2]) by omfedm14.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id AB1CE22C63C; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:53:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from puexch31.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.29]) by omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 8B6CD27C037; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:53:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.8]) by puexch31.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.29]) with mapi; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:53:32 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:53:31 +0100
Thread-Topic: [I-D.ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking] Issue #3: Lifetime Management/failure
Thread-Index: AcyunkdiXnurjpDLTaSVM1gJWEmcaA==
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A8D050CED@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A8D050CEDPUEXCB1Bnante_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.395186, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2011.11.29.122414
Cc: "fdupont@isc.org" <fdupont@isc.org>
Subject: [pcp] [I-D.ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking] Issue #3: Lifetime Management/failure
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:53:34 -0000
Dear all,
Francis has raised in the past the following failure scenario:
o UPnP Control Point creates a mapping with a 5 day lifetime
o IWF creates the corresponding pinhole with one day lifetime,
schedules a renewal each 24 hours and returns success
o 3 days after the renewal fails
Question: What to do? e.g., state this is a rare failure case and we
can do nothing? Any other proposal?
Cheers,
Med
- [pcp] [I-D.ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking] Issue … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [pcp] [I-D.ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking] Is… Dave Thaler
- Re: [pcp] [I-D.ietf-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking] Is… Francis Dupont