[perpass] Fwd: [] Draft report on IETF89 PM review lunch meeting report
Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> Wed, 12 March 2014 10:22 UTC
Return-Path: <avri@acm.org>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52821A0673 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 03:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.664
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.664 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CkDwDwjLgg_B for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 03:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob12.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob12.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F891A094C for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 03:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.203]) by atl4mhob12.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2CAMHiv023851 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:22:17 -0400
Received: (qmail 27980 invoked by uid 0); 12 Mar 2014 10:22:17 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 68.15.42.104
X-Authenticated-UID: avri@ella.com
Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (avri@ella.com@68.15.42.104) by 0 with ESMTPA; 12 Mar 2014 10:22:17 -0000
Message-ID: <53203558.5000609@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:22:16 -0400
From: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: perpass@ietf.org
References: <532034C7.5080502@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <532034C7.5080502@acm.org>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <532034C7.5080502@acm.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050008020006010301050603"
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140311-3, 03/11/2014), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perpass/cDsTeOSzTu-GH5ha0xXHwvchpvw
Subject: [perpass] Fwd: [] Draft report on IETF89 PM review lunch meeting report
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:22:28 -0000
There was a decision to use the ietf-privacy email list for the PM review work work instead of the perpass list. This was sent to ietf-privacy list and then forwarded to perpass, but we should probably try to limit discussion to the ietf-privacy list if at all possible. avri -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [ietf-privacy] Draft report on IETF89 PM review lunch meeting report Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:19:51 -0400 From: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> To: ietf-privacy@ietf.org Draft Meeting report. A set of notes created by Scott Brim (thanks!) can be found at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GwD5m09p42fS3OWucYwPZ0lWcVN8Y_HIN0yp2BzYYYI/edit?usp=sharing Those who were at the meeting should feel free to add their comments. A text view of their current state is attached to this message. In terms of the meeting, we discussed several issues and I believe we came up with the following: - Volunteers will be begin to work on reviews of existing standards track RFCs - While the reviews will be primarily for Pervasive Monitoring (PM) risks and issues, privacy issues will also be in scope for the reviews. - Several Protocols were given as first examples including; -- DNS (there are already some reviews in circulation) -- DHCP (There is already an review i this area) -- URI usage -- yet to be selected from the INT area There is a long list of things to be reviewed. Stephen Farrell agreed to check with other ADs on any particular recommendations they might have on docs to be reviewed. - There are several volunteers for this work listed in the meeting notes. Several volunteers came forward later. This will be tracked on the wiki once it is set up. - An initial milestone of 15 May was set for some of the reviews. - We had a discussion of some of the review work that had been done. It was the feeling of the group that while we should be collecting a set of bases for PM reviews, we would build on the work done for privacy including RFC6973 Questionnaire. Creating a criteria set for PM reviewing would be an ongoing project. There was discussion on the utility of prioritizing or categorizing the PM and Privacy concerns. - While the group did not decide to work on reviews of current drafts, there was a spirit of cooperation on the work being done by Gen Art. This needs follow-up. - There was a decision to use the ietf-privacy email list for this work instead of the perpass list. This is being sent to ietf-privacy and then forwarded to perpass, but we should probably try to limit discussion to the ietf-privacy list if at all possible. - I will work to coordinate activities Using an IETF WIki. this Wiki has been setup, <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/ppm-legacy-review/> but I have not done anything with it yet. Still learning this flavor of wiki, but will have some first pages soon. Eg. will put thse notes and the meeting notes on the wiki. 26 People signed the not quite blue sheets.
- [perpass] Fwd: [] Draft report on IETF89 PM revie… Avri Doria
- Re: [perpass] Fwd: [] Draft report on IETF89 PM r… Stephen Farrell