Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast



>> We need to reach a consensus on this before Stig submits a draft ready for 
>> wglc. Stig's proposal is to always use multicast BSMs. Doing so would 
>> remove the complexities of supporting unicast BSMs but would also create 
>> backward compatibility consequences. We'd particularly like to hear from 
>> those who may have implemented unicast BSMs. What say you?

    Could we do a survey on how widespread BSR/BSMs are used to quantify the
    impact on compatibility?

Dino

_______________________________________________
pim mailing list
pim at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.