Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast

To: Stig Venaas <stig.venaas at uninett.no>
Subject: Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast
From: John Zwiebel <jzwiebel at cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:23:27 -0700
Cc: Leonard Giuliano <lenny at juniper.net>, pim at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <444FDF87.7080704@uninett.no>
List-help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0604251347510.4692@irp-view6.cisco.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0604251349250.4692@irp-view6.cisco.com> <200604252204.k3PM4ef4025006@dino-lnx.cisco.com> <92AB8F7F-DA1F-43DE-A328-C3DF4C929DD5@cisco.com> <00c501c66904$023c26c0$1d736e0a@china.huawei.com> <20060426092750.I17565@corp-shell1.juniper.net> <8B619D48-40E7-437A-8504-88A56CF7D99E@cisco.com> <444FDF87.7080704@uninett.no>


On Apr 26, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Stig Venaas wrote:

I suppose one draw-back of BSR vs auto-RP is that BSR uses its own flooding algorithm instead of a standard one :)

I believe many implementations now forward both BSR and AUTO-RP the same way. If you don't support densemode, you're kind of forced to.

_______________________________________________
pim mailing list
pim at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim

References:
- Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast
  - From: Mike McBride
- Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast
  - From: Dino Farinacci
- Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast
  - From: John Zwiebel
- Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast
  - From: Cao Wei
- Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast
  - From: Leonard Giuliano
- Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast
  - From: John Zwiebel
- Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast
  - From: Stig Venaas

Prev by Date: Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast
Next by Date: Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast
Previous by thread: Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast
Next by thread: Re: [pim] Replacing unicast BSMs with multicast
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.