Re: [pim] New PIM Charter and milestones
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pim] New PIM Charter and milestones





On 1/28/07 11:36 AM, "Rahul Aggarwal" <rahul at juniper.net> wrote:

> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> Please see below:
> 
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Mike McBride wrote:
> 
>> Here is a second pass at pimwg rechartering text. Please review. I added a
>> 'may' with BSR which 'may' satisfy Lenny's previous concern.
>> 
>> Description of Working Group:
>> 
>> The Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) Working Group has completed the
>> standardization of PIM with RFC 4601. The WG has determined there is
>> additional work to be accomplished and is chartered to standardize
>> extensions to RFC 4601 - Protocol Independent Multicast Version 2 - Sparse
>> Mode. These PIM extensions could involve multipoint label switching,
> 
> "multipoint label switching" is within the charter of the MPLS WG. This
> shouldn't be a charter item in the PIM WG.
> 
>> reliability, resiliency, scalability, management, security and VPNs.
> 
> Multicast in L2VPNs is in the charter of L2VPN WG, and multicast
> in L3VPNs is in the charter of L3VPN WG. VPNs shouldn't be a charter item
> in the PIM WG.
> 
> rahul
> 

I think you missed the words "PIM extensions".

And I also did a search of "PIM" in the charters of the three WGs you
mentioned, and didn't come up with any relevant text mentioning possible
modification to PIM.


> 
>> Additional work on PIM-BIDIR and BSR may also be necessary. The working
>> group will continue to specify the MIBs required for PIM and its
>> enhancements. The PIM WG will further enhance RFC4601 as an even more
>> scalable, efficient and robust multicast routing protocol, which is
>> capable of supporting thousands of groups, different types of multicast
>> applications, and all major underlying layer-2 subnetwork technologies.
>> The working group will determine if a Version 3 of PIM is required.
>> 
>> Goals and Milestones:
>> 
>> Mar    2006     Ratify new WG charter and milestones
>> Jul    2006     Submit the BSR MIB as a Proposed Standard
>> Jul    2006     Develop a reliable pim specification
>> Jul    2006     Submit a generic TLV PIM Join Attribute Proposed Standard
>> draft
>> Jul    2006     Submit RPF Vector (use of PIM Join Attribute) as a
>> Proposed Standard
>> Jul    2006     Submit a mechanism to authenticate PIM link local messages
>> using AH as Proposed Standard
>> Jul    2006     Submit an Informational PIM last hop threats document.
>> 
>> -mike
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> pim mailing list
>> pim at ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list
> pim at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim


-- 
Yiqun

_______________________________________________
pim mailing list
pim at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.