[pim] 答复: DR priority adjustment automatically according to the status of the tracked interfaces
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pim] 答复: DR priority adjustment automatically according to the status of the tracked interfaces
The figure is updated as follows:
|
| +-----+ +------------------------+
+---+ R1 +-----+ |
| +-----+ |
|
+-------+ | |
| +----------+
|Client +---+ | PIM-SM Network +----+Source |
+-------+ | |
| +----------+
| +-----+ |
|
+---+ R2 +-----+ |
| +-----+ +------------------------+
|
Xiaohu
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: pim-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:pim-bounces at ietf.org] 代表 Xu Xiaohu
> 发送时间: 2009年8月5日 11:00
> 收件人: pim at ietf.org
> 主题: [pim] DR priority adjustment automatically according to
> the status of the tracked interfaces
>
> Hi all,
>
> In the following PIM-SM (or SSM) scenario, R!, R2 and Client
> are located with the same LAN. R1 is elected as the DR for
> that LAN. Now R1's uplink to the PIM-SM Network is down, as
> long as R1 still acts as the DR, the multicast stream will be
> broken soon or later.
>
> |
> | +-----+ +------------------+
> +---+ R1 +----+ |
> | +-----+ | |
> +-------+ | | | +-------+
> |Client +---+ | PIM-SM Network +--+Source |
> +-------+ | | | +-------+
> | +-----+ | |
> +---+ R2 +----+ |
> | +-----+ +------------------+
> |
>
> I wonder whether it is suitable for the DR (e.g., R1 in the
> above figure) to track the upstream link, and once the
> tracked link is down, its DR priority is reduced
> automatically so as to cease the DR role. Of couse, this
> mechanism is also suitable for the scenario where the
> Multicast Souce is connected to more than one PIM routers via LAN.
>
> Any comment? Or whether some vendor has already implement
> this feature?
>
> Xiaohu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list
> pim at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.