Re: [pim] Manual Post Requested for draft-xu-pim-drpriority-auto-adjustment
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pim] Manual Post Requested for draft-xu-pim-drpriority-auto-adjustment
Hi all,
I have just submitted the 01 version of
draft-xu-pim-drpriority-auto-adjustment. In this new version, some details
are specified and three other co-authors are added.
The link is:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-pim-drpriority-auto-adjustment-01
Any comment is appreciated.
Best wishes,
Xiaohu
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:idsubmission at ietf.org]
> 发送时间: 2009年10月19日 15:52
> 收件人: internet-drafts at ietf.org
> 抄送: xuxh at huawei.com; sganesan at extremenetworks.com; rajiva at cisco.com;
> pjhingra at cisco.com
> 主题: Manual Post Requested for draft-xu-pim-drpriority-auto-adjustment
>
> Manual Posting Requested for following Internet-Draft:
>
> I-D Submission Tool URL:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/status.cgi?submission_id=18651
>
>
> Filename: draft-xu-pim-drpriority-auto-adjustment
> Version: 01
> Staging URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/staging/draft-xu-pim-drpriority-auto-adjustment-01.txt
> Title: PIM-SM DR Priority Auto-Adjustment
> Creation_date: 2009-10-19
> WG ID: Individual Submission
> Number_of_pages: 6
> Abstract:
> This document defines a mechanism for automatically adjusting the
> Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) Designed Router (DR) priority
> according to the status of the tracked interface. This approach can
> be used to realize DR auto-switchover in case the DR loses the route
> to multicast source or Rendezvous Point (RP).
>
> Conventions used in this document
>
> The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
> "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
> document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119 [RFC2119].
>
> Submitter: Xiaohu Xu (xuxh at huawei.com)
>
> Author(s):
> Xiaohu Xu, xuxh at huawei.com
> SriManikandan Ganesan, sganesan at extremenetworks.com
> Rajiv Asati, rajiva at cisco.com
> Prashant Jhingran, pjhingra at cisco.com
>
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.