Re: [pim] Registry for PIM message types

To: eckert at cisco.com
Subject: Re: [pim] Registry for PIM message types
From: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda at sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:19:02 +0100 (CET)
Cc: pim at ietf.org
Delivered-to: pim at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <20091119005845.GJ18455 at cisco.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pim>
List-help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4B049489.3010504 at venaas.com> <20091119005845.GJ18455 at cisco.com>

Hi,

> P.S.:
> 
> I for once would definitely like to see any form of mtracev2 to
> use PIM rather than IGMP message type before standardizing it (that
> would allow to make PIM the only protocol type of interest on transit
> subnets and would simplify filtering).

Answering for your P.S. part, the current mtracev2 does not use IGMP
but UDP.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-05

Regards,
--
Hitoshi Asaeda

References:
- [pim] Registry for PIM message types
  - From: Stig Venaas
- Re: [pim] Registry for PIM message types
  - From: Toerless Eckert

Prev by Date: [pim] About comments on draft-xu-pim-drpriority-auto-adjustment-01//re: pim wg mtg minutes Hiroshima
Next by Date: Re: [pim] Registry for PIM message types
Previous by thread: Re: [pim] Registry for PIM message types
Next by thread: Re: [pim] Registry for PIM message types
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [pim] Registry for PIM message types

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.