Re: OCSP - Adoption of response models
David.Tillemans@utimaco.be Fri, 04 April 2003 12:13 UTC
Received: from above.proper.com (mail.proper.com [208.184.76.45]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA18352 for <pkix-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 07:13:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h34AwMJM016608 for <ietf-pkix-bks@above.proper.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 02:58:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h34AwLau016607 for ietf-pkix-bks; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 02:58:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordomo set sender to owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from utimaco.be (mail.utimaco.be [193.121.107.230]) by above.proper.com (8.12.9/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h34AwJJM016599 for <ietf-pkix@imc.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 02:58:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from smtp@localhost) by utimaco.be (8.11.1/8.11.1) id h34AxYd07297; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:59:34 GMT (envelope-from David.Tillemans@utimaco.be)
X-Authentication-Warning: Internet-Router.utimaco.be: smtp set sender to <David.Tillemans@utimaco.be> using -f
Received: from belgien1(10.7.0.25), claiming to be "belgien1.utimaco.be" via SMTP by Internet-Router, id smtpdXv7294; Fri Apr 4 10:59:27 2003
Subject: Re: OCSP - Adoption of response models
To: chris.gilbert@royalmail.com
Cc: ietf-pkix@imc.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001
Message-ID: <OF1FA44616.39B14F31-ONC1256CFE.003B7196@utimaco.be>
From: David.Tillemans@utimaco.be
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 12:51:01 +0200
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Belgien1/Utimaco/BE(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 04/04/2003 12:51:03 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Hi Chris, I should also think that it is the response model II). But who thrust/signs the certificate of the VA. Friendly greetings, Utimaco Safeware - Digital Transaction Security David Tillemans Project Leader Tel. +32 (0)16 440135 Fax. +32 (0)16 440140 mailto:David.Tillemans@utimaco.be Internet http://www.utimaco.be ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by telephone on +3216440135 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ chris.gilbert@roya lmail.com To: ietf-pkix@imc.org Sent by: cc: owner-ietf-pkix@ma Subject: OCSP - Adoption of response models il.imc.org 04/04/2003 11:46 RFC2560 offers three valid response models for OCSP (Two too many in my opinion) i. Signed by the CA ii. Signed by a VA with explicit delegation by the CA iii. A local model Does anyone have a feel for which model boasts the most widespread adoption ? I feel it should be ii) but suspect its iii) Deployment of the technology appears to be too scarce at present to make a sensible judgement. Opinions appreciated Chris This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the named recipient, you must not use, disclose, reproduce, copy or distribute the contents of this communication. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and then delete this email from your system.
- OCSP - Adoption of response models chris.gilbert
- Re: OCSP - Adoption of response models Peter Gutmann
- Re: OCSP - Adoption of response models David.Tillemans
- Re: OCSP - Adoption of response models chris.gilbert
- Re: OCSP - Adoption of response models Florian Oelmaier
- Re: OCSP - Adoption of response models chris.gilbert
- RE: OCSP - Adoption of response models Miguel Rodriguez
- RE: OCSP - Adoption of response models Ryan M. Hurst
- RE: OCSP - Adoption of response models Ambarish Malpani
- RE: OCSP - Adoption of response models Ryan M. Hurst
- RE: OCSP - Adoption of response models Liaquat Khan
- Re: OCSP - Adoption of response models Jean-Marc Desperrier
- RE: OCSP - Adoption of response models Ryan M. Hurst