Paul Hoffman wrote: > At 6:05 PM +0000 11/17/09, Dr Stephen Henson wrote: >> Do we need uniform encoding of names or just consistent encoding? For example if >> a CA has decided to encode a name in a certain way it sticks to that encoding >> afterwards and never uses a different one. > > We need uniform encoding because relying parties will have more than one trust anchor. > Can you expand on why that needs uniform encoding? Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. Core developer of the OpenSSL project: http://www.openssl.org/ Freelance consultant see: http://www.drh-consultancy.co.uk/ Email: shenson at drh-consultancy.co.uk, PGP key: via homepage.
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.