Re: [PMOL] comments on draft-ietf-pmol-metrics-framework-00

[Al Morton <acmorton at att.com>]

One additional point, this definition for the term Index:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-framework-compagg-06#section-3.7
could move to the PMOL framework memo, it seems to be
a different sort of composition than the types we addressed in
IPPM draft.

At 05:09 PM 10/29/2008, you wrote:
> I was asked to look at section 3.3 in particular,
> to help sync it up with:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ippm-framework-compagg-07.txt
>
> comments below, as a participant,
> Al
>
> looks like [Ref ?] = draft-ietf-ippm-framework-compagg-07.txt
>
>
> > 3.3.  Composed Metrics
> > ...
> >    Spatial Composition is defined as the composition of metrics of the
> >    same type with differing spatial domains [Ref ?].  For spatially
> >    composed metrics to be meaningful, the spatial domains should be non-
> >    overlapping and contiguous, and the composition operation should be
> >    mathematically appropriate for the type of metric.
>
> Although we've used terms "complete path", "sub-path", and"network" 
> in the IPPM reference, spatial domains seems to work fine here.
>
> >    Temporal Composition is defined as the composition of metrics of the
> >    same type with differing time spans [Ref ?].  For temporally composed
> >    metrics to be meaningful, the time spans should be non-overlapping
> >    and contiguous, and the composition operation should be
> >    mathematically appropriate for the type of metric.
>
> Time spans is fine, too. We've used time "Intervals" and "sub-intervals"
> in the IPPM draft, but both are clear.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PMOL mailing list
> PMOL at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol

_______________________________________________
PMOL mailing list
PMOL at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol