Re: [pmtud] Re: [Tsvwg] Working group last call on draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-padding-01

[Lars Eggert <lars.eggert at netlab.nec.de>]

On Oct 11, 2006, at 5:57, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> > Section 5., paragraph 3:
> > >       The reference to sctp-parameters [3] should be removed  
> > from the
> > >       "Normative References" section after the IANA section has  
> > been
> > >       removed.
> >
> >   Why would the IANA section be removed?
> This section is written like the one for SCTP-AUTH which was  
> suggested by
> James. I thought, that the IANA section gets deleted when IANA has  
> done
> its job. Isn't that right? James?

The IANA section customarily gets removed when all it has is "this  
document requires no IANA actions", purely to increase readability.  
Documents that require IANA actions do keep the section when published.

The same is true for SCTP-AUTH. I hadn't realized that has the same  
problem and I didn't see an email on the list about this, but the  
IANA section must remain in place there, too.

Lars
--
Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
pmtud mailing list
pmtud at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmtud