Re: [pmtud] Re: [Tsvwg] Working group last call on draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-padding-01

[Lars Eggert <lars.eggert at netlab.nec.de>]

On Oct 14, 2006, at 14:21, James M. Polk wrote:
> At 02:06 PM 10/14/2006 +0900, Lars Eggert wrote:
> > On Oct 14, 2006, at 14:03, James M. Polk wrote:
> > > SCTP-AUTH has a large and well written IANA section, and is not
> > > void of doing anything, so I'm confused by comparing what happens
> > > to Padding with what happens to AUTH.  Lars, can you explain your
> > > comments some more?
> >
> > SCTP-AUTH currently says:
> >
> >       NOTE to RFC-Editor:
> >
> >       "RFCXXXX" is to be replaced by the RFC number you assign this
> >       document.
> >
> >       The reference to sctp-parameters [7] should be removed from the
> >       "Normative References" section after the IANA section has been
> >       removed.
> >
> > The IANA section should NOT be removed here either.
>
> I read the above as stating the reference (#7 in the references  
> section) should be removed, not the IANA section, which is how I'm  
> reading what you are implying you think the doc is asking to do.

The text above literally says that [7] is removed from the references  
section *after the IANA section has been removed*, which obviously  
implies that the IANA section is to be removed. I can see no other  
way to read this?

The IANA section should not be removed, for both SCTP-PAD or SCTP-AUTH.

Lars
--
Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories



_______________________________________________
pmtud mailing list
pmtud at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmtud