[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Policy] PCELS and PCLS
mpana@metasolv.com wrote, On 01/28/04 12:27:
PCLS implementers, The main issue that was expressed relative to the
previous revision (-03) of PCELS was its "unfriendly" position relative
to PCLS. PCELS has been changed (-04) to address this issue and a new
section was specifically added to the document for discussing the
[non]impact of PCELS on PCLS implementations.
Has anybody had the chance to read the -04 revision? Do you find the new
approach acceptable? In particular, are there any comments regarding the
provisions of section "4.3 Impact on existing implementations of the
Policy Core LDAP Schema"?
Thank You,
Mircea Pana.
Mircea,
I thank and congratulate you and your co-authors for your careful
and thorough consideration of the PCLS compatibility issues. Your
draft achieves the goal of doing no harm to PCLS. Your draft's section
4.3 is especially welcome. It assures the PCLS implementer of
compatibility, while carefully pointing out the few minor areas of
potential but minimal conflict.
In addition, your draft's ASCII object diagrams are first rate. You
have done good work to illustrate a complex model.
Thanks again,
--
--
#::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::|
# Larry Bartz
#
# voice (317) 226-7060
# FAX (317) 226-6378
#::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::|
_______________________________________________
Policy mailing list
Policy@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy