[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Policy] PCELS draft



Kurt,
1) I noticed a number of RFC 2252 schema definitions
(e.g., pcelsIsMirrored) not accompanied by prose which detailed
the schema element.  While an RFC 2252 schema definition should
be provided for each schema element, providing such should not
be viewed by itself to provide a complete technical
specification of the schema element.  The prose needs to detail
all aspects of the schema element, such as application syntax
and semantics, not covered in the RFC 2252 schema definition.
It is also good to echo aspects of the RFC 2252 schema definition
in the prose.

The lack of prose at various elements is due to the fact that the prose is written down in the Information Model (RFC 3460). We don't feel like duplicating all of it.

Marcus


_______________________________________________
Policy mailing list
Policy@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy