Re: [Policy] pcimRepository and pcelsReusableContainer

[Ryan Moats <rmoats at lemurnetworks.net>]

On Sunday 15 February 2004 08:04 pm, mpana@metasolv.com wrote:
> The open issue #4 listed in Appendix B) in PCELS-04 refers to the proposed
> implementation for the ReusablePolicyContainer class. The authors have
> reached an impasse and would appreciate input from the WG wrt. the options
> presented below.

I'll admit to not being an implementer of PCELS (either currently or planned).  
Having said that, if I were going to implement PCELS on top of my PCLS 
implementation, I don't really see the difference between the two approaches.  
The same entry could be designated both pcimRepository and 
pcelsReusableContainer independent of the two options.

Color me confused because this really looks like a nit.

Ryan

_______________________________________________
Policy mailing list
Policy@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy