RE: [Policy] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema-04 .txt

["John Strassner" <John.Strassner at intelliden.com>]

Title: Message

Resending, since original email was too long...

 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Strassner
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 12:26 PM
To: mpana@metasolv.com; policy@ietf.org; 'John Strassner'
Cc: bwijnen@lucent.com; joel@stevecrocker.com
Subject: RE: [Policy] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema-04 .txt

Sorry, I've been swamped. I'll reply to this thread later today, and try and review your draft again this weekend.

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: mpana@metasolv.com [mailto:mpana@metasolv.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 7:31 AM
To: John Strassner; policy@ietf.org
Cc: bwijnen@lucent.com; joel@stevecrocker.com
Subject: RE: [Policy] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema-04 .txt

John,

 

Is there going to be a follow-up on this message thread? If not, we will issue one more (minor) revision of PCELS  to address the "MUST contradicts the first SHOULD" issue as discussed below. Then, we would ask for Joel's recommendation wrt. advancing the draft to the next stage.

 

Thanks,

Mircea.