No, PolicyRule is not an abstract class
in CIM / PCIM, although PolicyCondition and PolicyAction are. The
idea is that PolicyRule is basically just a "hub" that ties together
some conditions, some actions, some time period conditions, some roles,
etc. It's usable as it is "in production", for expressing
real policies.
PolicyCondition and PolicyAction, on
the other hand, must in general be subclassed, since by themselves they
are content-free.
Regards,
Bob
Bob Moore
Advanced Design and Technology
IBM Software Group System House
+1-919-254-4436
remoore at us.ibm.com
"Daniel Martinez"
<dani at dif.um.es> Sent by: policy-bounces at ietf.org
06/11/2004 10:24 AM
To
<policy at ietf.org>
cc
Subject
[Policy] No specific policy
rule type in QPIM
Hi,
I've noticed that QPIM does not define a specific type for a policy rule.
But, since PolicyRule in CIM is abstract, shouldn't there be a
"QoSPolicyRule"-like class in QPIM?
Regards,
-------------------------------------------------------
Daniel J. Martinez Manzano
Dept. Ingenieria de la Informacion y las Comunicaciones
Facultad de Informatica
Universidad de Murcia
Email: dani at dif.um.es
Tel: +34 968 398 258
_______________________________________________
Policy mailing list
Policy at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy