Re: [Pppext] Suggesting Improvements in RFC 1990.

[Karl Fox <karlfox at columbus.rr.com>]

If someone were to ask me (which they haven't), I'd say leave RFC  
1990 alone unless you fix it.  By "fixing it" I mean combining two  
links, each with probability of failure p, and providing a combined  
link with probability of failure p^2 rather than 2p as RFC 1990 does.

Karl

P.S.  I may be years out of date on this issue, but the last time I  
participated in an argument on the topic we couldn't come up with a  
way of making a single-link-failure not hose up the entire bundle, at  
least not until LQM shut it down and removed it from the bundle.   
Cleverer people than I may have solved this since then.

_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
Pppext at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext