RE: [Pppext] Suggesting Improvements in RFC 1990.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Pppext] Suggesting Improvements in RFC 1990.
> From: James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
> To: Vernon Schryver <vjs at calcite.rhyolite.com>
> Cc: pppext at ietf.org
> > - get rid of or deprecate Self-Describing-Padding.
> > I disagree with James Carlson. I believe there are no existing
> > implementations except perhaps student exercises that include
> > Self-Describing-Padding.
>
> How is that disagreeing with me?
I was being flip.
> I also said there are no known
> implementations that do this, and the point of it at all is rather
> obscure and almost completely without merit on non-terminal fragments.
You say "rather obscure and almost completely without merit on
non-terminal fragments." That is an effusive recommendation compared
to what I think about it. My views about it are more negative than
"completely without merit."
Vernon Schryver vjs at rhyolite.com
_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
Pppext at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.