RE: [PWE3] PWE3 question

[Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>]

Vinay,

The exact wording of the charter is:

"PWE3 protocols and implementation focus on the edge-to-edge emulation and maintenance of service-specific pseudo-wires. Creation and placement of the tunnels is outside of the scope."

I don't see any thing here that prevents using one level tunnel. Do you see any?

-Shahram


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vinay Bannai [mailto:Vinay@luminous.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 6:13 PM
> To: Shahram Davari; 'Sasha Vainshtein'; 'Andrew G. Malis'
> Cc: 'pwe3@ietf.org'
> Subject: RE: [PWE3] PWE3 question
> 
> 
> I am little confused by the discussion that has been going on so far
> regarding using a single label vs stacked label (using MPLS 
> encapsulation as
> a example). Here is what I take from the PWE3 working group charter:
> 
> - The setting up of the pseudo wire end to end is a function 
> of the end
> points
> - The existence of a tunnel LSP is a given and how it is 
> setup does not fall
> under the purview of PWE3
> 
> Maybe I am reading this wrong, isn't this what the charter implies?
> 
> Vinay
> 

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3