[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PWE3] PWE3 question

To: Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] PWE3 question
From: Eric Rosen <erosen@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 17:06:01 -0400
cc: "Rutemiller, John" <John.Rutemiller@marconi.com>, "'pwe3@ietf.org'" <pwe3@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 15 May 2002 12:18:36 -0700. <4B6D09F3B826D411A67300D0B706EFDE84A7F4@nt-exch-yow.pmc-sierra.bc.ca>
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
Reply-To: erosen@cisco.com
Sender: pwe3-admin@ietf.org
User-Agent: EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3(Unebigoryōmae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2(sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)


Shahram> 1) The use  of 1 label  reduces the  number of label  lookups that
Shahram>    needs to be supported at PEs. Same objective as PHP!

You could of course use PHP ;-)

Shahram> The issue is not the need to  keep the state at the core, rather it
Shahram> is why it MUST be precluded?  

My point was  that it is not precluded.  The signaling  protocols do not say
how one maps pseudowires to tunnels, hence you could have one pseudowire per
tunnel if that's what you want.  



_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

References:
- RE: [PWE3] PWE3 question
  - From: Shahram Davari

Prev by Date: RE: [PWE3] PWE3 question
Next by Date: RE: [PWE3] PWE3 question
Previous by thread: RE: [PWE3] PWE3 question
Next by thread: RE: [PWE3] PWE3 question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread