RE: [PWE3] re: Proposed way to move forward for ATM/MPLS in pwe3

["Andrew G. Malis" <Andy.Malis@VivaceNetworks.com>]

Neil,

I also like it very much.  It's also a nice example of "thinking out of the 
box" (to use an over-used phrase) to come up with an innovative and 
straightforward solution to the problem.

Cheers,
Andy

-------

At 6/1/2002 01:28 AM +0100, neil.2.harrison@bt.com wrote:
>Khalid Ahmad wrote 31 May 2002 21:48
><snip>
>I am not so sure whether your proposal is "simpler" than PDU mode or not,
>but it sure is different, and so seems to introduce a new mode, which as you
>put it, is a variation of cell mode.
>NH=> Not sure how closely you have looked at what John proposed Khalid.  I
>have looked carefully at all the various encaps drafts and John's is by far
>the best IMO.  Not only does it treat the varying encaps modes in a logical
>and easy to follow (in increasing compression-ordering) manner, but its got
>a smart way of avoiding fragmentation by using a form of suspend/resume that
>triggers frame-sending on an incoming ATM OAM/RM cell when in frame-mode.
>I'd like to think people will consider it seriously for adoption.
>regards Neil
><snipped to end NH>
>
>_______________________________________________
>pwe3 mailing list
>pwe3@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3


_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3