[PWE3] draft-bocci-pwe3-app-frame-over-psn-00.txt

[Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>]

Folks,
Please comment on this (if you care).  

Also, I'd really like to see the 3(?) frame draft authors 
attempt to converge on a single approach, and if not, let 
us know why before we proceed with any of them.

-danny


------- Forwarded Message

Return-Path: Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk
Delivery-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 01:10:41 -0600
Received: from mail.alcatel.co.uk (mail.alcatel.co.uk [195.92.62.199])
	by tcb.net (8.11.6/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g567AcW13464
	for <danny@tcb.net>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 01:10:40 -0600
Received: from gbmail02.netfr.alcatel.fr (relay02.net.alcatel.co.uk [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.alcatel.co.uk (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g567B8327094;
	Thu, 6 Jun 2002 08:11:08 +0100
From: Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: danny@tcb.net
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PWE3] IETF 54 Agenda
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.6  December 14, 2000
Sender: Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk
Message-ID: <OF5C9947E3.2EC22666-ON80256BCF.0060113B@netfr.alcatel.fr>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 08:11:07 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on GBMAIL02/GB/ALCATEL(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at
 06/06/2002 08:11:08,
	Serialize complete at 06/06/2002 08:11:08
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Danny,

I would like to request that draft-bocci-pwe3-app-frame-over-psn-00.txt 
be considered as a working group draft.

Best regards,

Matthew



Please respond to danny@tcb.net
Sent by:        pwe3-admin@ietf.org
To:     pwe3@ietf.org
cc: 
Subject:        [PWE3] IETF 54 Agenda



Folks,
If you'd like space on the agenda in Yokohama please send me
your request ASAP.  Please make sure that the topics and/or
items you plan to discuss have been addressed on the mailing
list beforehand.

Also, if you're expecting your draft to be adopted by the WG
but haven't explicitly requested it please contact me
directly.

Those folks that were slated to submit a revised version of
a draft and intend to ask that it be accepted as a WG item
please get the documents posted ASAP so that everyone has
time to review before the upcoming meeting.

Please remember to include an applicability section and employ
terminology defined in the requirements, framework & protocol
layering drafts.  Please try to avoid new overlapping terminology
and there's no need to redefine terms lists in the framework and
requirements documents.

Our "Goals and Milestones" suggest that we'll be accepting
service-specific drafts as WG items this month.  Those of
you on the line to publish updated versions of these drafts
for review need to do so ASAP.

Finally, the Requirements and Framework documents are slated
to go to last call sometime this month as well.  While that's
probably just a bit premature, I'd like to try and get this
done within a few weeks after the upcoming meeting.  That being
the case, please provide feedback to the authors/mailing list
ASAP.

Thanks!

- -danny



_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3



------- End of Forwarded Message


_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3