[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [PWE3] draft-malis-pwe3-sonet-03 and draft-danenberg-pw-cem-mib-02 tobe WG drafts
- To: "Andrew G. Malis" <Andy.Malis@VivaceNetworks.com>, <pwe3@ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: [PWE3] draft-malis-pwe3-sonet-03 and draft-danenberg-pw-cem-mib-02 tobe WG drafts
- From: "tom k. johnson" <tom_johnson@litchfieldcomm.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 09:39:39 -0400
- Cc: "Danny McPherson" <danny@tcb.net>
- List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
- Sender: pwe3-admin@ietf.org
- Thread-Index: AcIW4i1H6tWsYRzpTxStHlVxlcsWqAAsL92g
- Thread-Topic: [PWE3] draft-malis-pwe3-sonet-03 and draft-danenberg-pw-cem-mib-02 tobe WG drafts
I definitely agree.
SONET Emulation is in scope for PWE3, and these drafts conform to the charter. The protocol has been designed to compliment all three proposals for sub-STS-1 (DS3/E3/DS1/E1/etc.) emulation. So, adopting these drafts can be independent of how the DS3/E3 and below emulation question is resolved.
Furthermore, Dave Z, Dave D, and Tom N have done a great job integrating a MIB for this service into their framework MIB. That's got to be a first - to have the draft MIB ready the same time as the draft protocol :-)
And, there are several independent implementations either completed or well underway at this time, so it should be possible to get some real-life testing on the protocol later this year. Obviously, a key point in moving towards a standard.
Of course there's work to do and issues to be resolved, but surely this is good enough to use as a starting point for the WG.
Let's get these adopted and keep moving forward.
Thanks!
-Tom
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew G. Malis [mailto:Andy.Malis@VivaceNetworks.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:05 PM
> To: pwe3@ietf.org
> Cc: Danny McPherson
> Subject: [PWE3] draft-malis-pwe3-sonet-03 and
> draft-danenberg-pw-cem-mib-02 tobe WG drafts
>
>
> PWE3ers,
>
> draft-malis-pwe3-sonet-03.txt and its accompanying MIB,
> draft-danenberg-pw-cem-mib-02.txt, have both recently been
> updated based
> upon all WG comments to date. The major changes were to add an
> applicability statement section to the pwe3-sonet draft (new
> section 3),
> and in the case of the MIB, to have complete alignment with
> the other pwe3
> MIB drafts. This message is a request to make these two
> documents working
> group drafts.
>
> Many thanks,
> Andy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>
_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3