RE: [PWE3] Koleyni and Bocci drafts

[neil.2.harrison@bt.com]

Hi Khalid, see below (hope you had a nice holiday).  regards, Neil

-----Original Message-----
From: Khalid Ahmad [mailto:kmad@nortelnetworks.com]
Sent: 21 June 2002 15:36
To: Walsh, Thomas D (Tom); 'Jim Harford'; pwe3@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [PWE3] Koleyni and Bocci drafts


Colleagues, 
from the emails I have seen to this topic, I did not see any negative
comments to the Bocci and Koleyni drafts, and more importantly there have
been no technical issues raised.

NH=> Well, I have raised this point in the past, and will continue to so,
that the defect handling in *all* the drafts I have seen to date is either
inappropriate (ie layer violations or such) or (more usally) missing.  So as
far as I am concerned they are all still not fit for purpose.  Having said,
I am working though this with John Rutemiller and there should a draft soon
that is likely to get my/BT support.
<snipped to end NH>

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3