Re: Re: [PWE3] ITU-T FR draft

[claude.kawa@sympatico.ca]

The objective of the contributors to ITU-T SG17 draft Recommendation on frame relay/MPLS (X.84) is to ensure that it is aligned with regard to the terminolgy and capabilities with PWE3 draft.

Claude
> 
> From: Luca Martini <lmartini@cisco.com>
> Date: 2003/11/13 Thu PM 06:12:04 EST
> To: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
> CC: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>,  pwe3@ietf.org, 
>         Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
> Subject: Re: [PWE3] ITU-T FR draft
> 
> My understanding is that Claude ( FR editor ) is making sure this is the 
> case today.
> 
> What is the problem Yakov ?
> 
> Luca
> 
> Danny McPherson wrote:
> 
> >
> > I think this is fine, so long as the IETF document is aligned
> > with the goals and consensus of the WG and the IETF.  Do you
> > foresee any potential reasons why this might not be the case?
> >
> > -danny
> >
> >
> > On Nov 11, 2003, at 6:49 PM, Yaakov Stein wrote:
> >
> >> Dear WG chairs and everyone,
> >>
> >> I would like to re-iterate my suggestion that the IETF and
> >> ITU-T SG17 work together to produce a single harmonized
> >> FR draft.
> >>
> >> Since SG17 has adopted the PWE3 terminology,
> >> and there is great overlap in authors of the PWE and ITU drafts,
> >> it should be possible to make the documents precisely identical.
> >>
> >> This has been done before (e.g. Megaco/H.248)
> >> and has the advantage of ensuring that there can be
> >> no minor issues that can later crop up due to different
> >> wording.
> >>
> >> Y(J)S
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pwe3 mailing list
> > pwe3@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> 


_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3