RE: [PWE3] Proposal to Progress draft-orly-pwe3-satop-mib and draft-orly-pwe3-tdm-mib

[David Zelig <Davidz at corrigent.com>]

Orly,
There is an inconsistency between the MIB suggested and Sasha's draft
draft-vainshtein-pwe3-tdm-control-protocol-extension-00.txt - in the MIB
module you ask for a single PW type and the later draft suggests a PW type
per TDM mode. Since PwVcType should be one to one the PW type carried in the
signaling message, one of the two methods should be first selected.

In addition - I need a specific number allocated to whatever method  - so
when a decision will be made where the signaling extension for TDM will be
defined  - it should include suggested numbers and then I will update the tc
draft.
 
Thanks
David


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Orly Nicklass [mailto:orly_n@rad.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 7:11 AM
> To: tnadeau@cisco.com; pwe3@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [PWE3] Proposal to Progress 
> draft-orly-pwe3-satop-mib and draft-orly-pwe3-tdm-mib
> 
> 
>  
Snipped...

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3