Re: [PWE3] [Fwd: draft-ietf-pwe3-fragmentation-09.txt - LAST CALL]

[Stewart Bryant <stbryant at cisco.com>]

Since this is really just an editorial change to align
terminology I would think that the best approach would
be to see if anthing else surfaces in the LC and then
issue -10 shortly after 16th incorporating all necessary
changes.

- Stewart

Andrew G. Malis wrote:

> Stewart,
>
> Just to be clear, would you like me to issue a -10 with just this 
> change, or would you rather wait until WG last call concludes?   Or at 
> least wait until the post-IETF draft submission opens?
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
> -----------
>
> At 11/2/2005 18:51 +0000, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>
> > Mark, Andy
> >
> >
> >       0                   1                   2                   3
> >       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
> >      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >      | Rsvd  | Flags |B|E|   Length  |     Sequence Number           |
> >      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >
> >                     Figure 3: MPLS PWE3 Control Word
> >
> >
> > needs a small edit to align it with the changes that I made
> > to the CW draft in response to the gen-art review:
> >
> >
> >     0                   1                   2                   3
> >     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
> >    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >    |0 0 0 0| Flags |FRG|  Length   | Sequence Number               |
> >    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >
> >         Figure 2: Preferred PW MPLS Control Word
> >
> > - Stewart
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pwe3 mailing list
> > pwe3 at ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3 at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3