[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PWE3] Inter-op is not necessary



:-) Thought the same when reading 802.1ag....

- Ping

Shahram Davari wrote:
Hi Ping,


(6) OAM and OAM interworking: How would it work? Actually, would carriers allow the OAM packets going over the boundary of the network? If I am a carrier, I probably will not allow some guys on either end of my network to run some performance monitoring tests. Then how do we get edge-to-edge OAM?



An OAM architecture similar to IEEE 802.1ag or ITU Y.17ethoam, might be
useful. In these drafts the OAM flows are divided to 3 spaces:

- User OAM
- Network Operator (Carrier) OAM
- Service Provider OAM

Service provider contracts with a number of carriers to provide the service.
Service provider is responsible for e-2-e performance, and has access to
e-2-e OAM. While each carrier can only run OAM in its own network. This architecture
requires a method to distinguish/filter these 3 types of OAM flows.

Yours,
Shahram

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3 at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3


_______________________________________________ pwe3 mailing list pwe3 at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3