[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PWE3] Re: New Liaison Statement, "Liaison statement on T-MPLS OAM aspects"
Hello Yaakov,
You wrote:
How can we comment on Y.17tom if it is at such an early stage
that there is no text to look it?
The last sentence of the liaison states that only Y.17tor is
attached for information (and comment) and that Y.17tom is at
an early state and therefor not attached, so no comment expected.
Y.17tom currently contains only a framework that can be used
as a reference for contributions to fill it.
How can you predict going for consent in April,
if so little has been accomplished?
In the meeting it was agreed that the objective is to go
for consent in April 2006, there are two interim meetings
planned to meet this objective.
At very least we would like to see a draft before you go for consent,
as this may directly influence IETF work on OAM for MPLS and PWE.
This was also agreed during the meeting (sending the draft Y.17tom
to IETF) so don't worry.
Cheers, Huub.
--
================================================================
http://members.chello.nl/hhelvoort/
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...
_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3 at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3