Re: [PWE3] Clarification after Monday PWE3 WG meeting

[Loa Andersson <loa at pi.se>]

Italo,


Italo Busi wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> It's my understanding that some concerns have been raised after Monday PWE3 WG
> meeting, based upon some comments I made at the microphone.  In particular, my
> comment using the phrase "separate domains", which is being interpreted as
> meaning "disjoint networks" as described in Stewart's presentation.
> 
> I would like to clarify that this was not my intended meaning and that I fully
> support the agreements reached during the Stuttgart meeting.

this pretty much explains what you did not mean to say, not so much what
you wanted to say :) , if "separate domains" is not the same thing as
"disjoint networks" what are they? If you weren't commenting on the on
the slide in Stewarts presentation I've to assume that you agree with
it; so what was your comment about??

/Loa

> 
> I am available for offline discussion on this topic with anybody interested
> 
> Italo
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3 at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> 
> 


-- 
Loa Andersson

Principal Networking Architect
Acreo AB                           phone:  +46 8 632 77 14
Isafjordsgatan 22                  mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
Kista, Sweden                      email:  loa.andersson at acreo.se
                                           loa at pi.se

This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. http://www.astaro.com



_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3 at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3