[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PWE3] 答复: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4385 (1743)

To: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s at rad.com>
Subject: [PWE3] 答复: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4385 (1743)
From: jiang.xiaowei at zte.com.cn
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:42:28 +0800
Cc: pwe3 at ietf.org
Delivered-to: pwe3 at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <424CDC689E5CEF4D9FEADE56A378D9220218216A94 at exrad4.ad.rad.co.il>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Sir,

For the seq# space gap problem, could just make the seq# 0 be configurable for specific implementation so that vendors can interop with each other?

Thank you.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PWE3] ??: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4385 (1743)
  - From: Stewart Bryant
- Re: [PWE3] 答复: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4385 (1743)
  - From: Yaakov Stein

References:
- Re: [PWE3] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4385 (1743)
  - From: Yaakov Stein

Prev by Date: Re: [PWE3] Flow Label in fat-pw
Next by Date: Re: [PWE3] 答复: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4385 (1743)
Previous by thread: Re: [PWE3] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4385 (1743)
Next by thread: Re: [PWE3] 答复: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4385 (1743)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread