Re: [PWE3] draft-stein-pwe3-ethpwcong-00.txt for WG draft?

[Stewart Bryant <stbryant at cisco.com>]

A technical comment

Why do we use the drop eligibility bit rather than signaling
the priority in the PW label  TC bits?

Stewart

BOCCI Matthew wrote:
> Folks,
>
>  
>
> We have had a couple of participants that have expressed interest in 
> this draft, but I would still like to see a few more comments from the 
> working group.
>
>  
>
> Please review this draft and send any comments to the list. Please 
> also indicate whether or not you agree that this should become a WG item.
>
>  
>
> Best regards,
>
>  
>
> Matthew
>
>  
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* pwe3-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces at ietf.org] *On 
> Behalf Of *BOCCI Matthew
> *Sent:* 07 August 2009 17:12
> *To:* pwe3 at ietf.org
> *Subject:* [PWE3] draft-stein-pwe3-ethpwcong-00.txt for WG draft?
>
>  
>
> During the Stockholm meeting, Yaakov asked for the draft on Ethernet 
> PW Congestion Handling Mechanisms (draft-stein-pwe3-ethpwcong-00.txt) 
> to become a PWE3 WG draft.
>
> Please review the draft at 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-stein-pwe3-ethpwcong-00 and send any 
> comments to the PWE3 list by 21^st August.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Matthew
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3 at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>