Re: [PWE3] [mpls-tp] poll on making draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-07.txt a working group draft

["Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher at nsn.com>]

Hi Yaacov,

Thanks for the hint.

We will refer to these mechanisms in our next version.

Best regards,

Nurit

 

---

From: mpls-tp-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-tp-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Yaakov Stein
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 3:52 PM
To: mpls-tp at ietf.org
Cc: ccamp at ietf.org; pwe3 at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] poll on making draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-07.txt a working group draft

 

Support.

 

Although there are some glaring errors.

For example, for packet loss and delay there is a statement

   There is no mechanism defined in the IETF to support this function.

 

I think the authors should look at the RFCs produced by IPPM,

and in fact I think that OWAMP and/or TWAMP could be considered as an alternative to Y.1731 mechanisms.

 

Y(J)S