[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PWE3] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-vainshtein-cesopsn-06.txt



 
No. At this point, I am against. 

Is there a newer version of the "anavi" draft as well? (Yaakov?) Is that
addressing the issues raised earlier?

Thanks,
Alex

Danny McPherson wrote:
> 
> If there are other folks that would like to see this document become a WG
> item please speak up now.
> 
> -danny
> 
> On 6/10/03 10:12 AM, "Sasha Vainshtein" <Sasha@AXERRA.com> wrote:
> 
> > Stewart, Danny and all,
> > As (some of) you have probably noticed I have posted an
> > updated (-06) revision of the CESoPSN draft.
> >
> > I would like to ask the WG to adopt this draft as a WG item,
> > and this message is intended to initiate a TECHNICAL discussion
> > on this subject.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature